I decided
to turn my research to a Seven Years War army that played a major part in the
conflict, but, as yet, has received but little attention to the artillery it fielded.
For that reason, I believe, the below presented piece will be a ‘first-time’ ground
breaking introduction, for I’m not aware anyone has made an attempt before to
reconstruct or present an image of Hessian ordnance of this period. This is why
I felt the need to expand somewhat more on what made me do what I did. The
below will, thus, be somewhat more extensive.
It provides
several drafts of barrels and carriages of around 1770 as per the Marburg
archivist’s dating. Unfortunately, it has but few documents of the earlier
period of between 1740-1763.
Of
particular interest is document WHK 43/14 (folder 43, doc. 14). It’s
explications are headed Affuitirung nach Schwedischer
Manir wonach die Hessische eingerichtet ist,… [sic.] (Engl.: Carriage
construction in Swedish manner as to which the Hessian is equipped…)
 |
| document WHK 43/14 (folder 43, doc. 14) |
I decided
to take this reference to Swedish carriage construction rather serious and
point my research into this direction. One should be aware that earlier in the
18th century, Landgrave Friedrich I. of Hesse was also King of
Sweden, reigning from 1720 to his death in 1751. It is therefore rather
compelling to assume, some of the Swedish artillery know-how made it’s way to
Cassel during this period.
We know the
Hessian artillery was turned from its ancient semi-military guild footing to a
regular militarized establishment only in 1741 with the raising of a so
entitled standing Artillerie Corps. New
pieces of a lightened design were introduced. In 1741 twelve light 3-pounders
to serve as regimental pieces for the infantry battalions, along with some
6-pounders as a complement of heavy battery pieces were cast at the Cassel
foundry. Some more 3-pounders would have been cast during the next yeas in
order to supply the later raised regiments with cannons, replace losses, and to
arrive at the regulation 2 pieces per bataillon by 1757. During the War of
Austrian Succession (1741-1748) also a battery of 4 Hessian heavy 12-pounders
was fielded (see: Rudolf Witzel, Hessen
Kassels Regimenter in der Alliierten Armee 1762, Norderstedt 2007).
I’m near
certain these M1741 pieces were likewise fielded with carriages adapted in
Swedish manner and those drafts of the M1770 pieces illustrate material not so
different from the earlier design. Really, for the period well after the 7YW,
proportioning a barrel based on it’s caliber – i.e. diameter of the bore, instead
of the shot diameter, and also specifying the dimensions of the carriage likewise
by multiples of the caliber must be regarded as ‘old school’ and far from
latest state of art in gunnery by 1770. A good number of details seen with these
Hessian drafts can be found with Swedish scale drawings dating to the 1720’s.
Above image
shows a contemporary draft of the Swedish 3-pounder Regementsstycke M1725 (source: Jakobsson, Th., Artilleriet under Karl XII:s-tiden, Armémusei
Skrifter I, Stockholm 1943). Aside
from this pieces unusual rounded trail, the Hessian draft (WHK 43/14) is very
close to this earlier Swedish design. Of special concern are those distinctive ‘lids’
that serve to fasten the barrel to the carriage, which so far, I haven’t seen
with any other nations artillery of this period.
The Swedish
barrel of the M1725 3-pounder was 18 calibers long. The Hessian 1741 cast
3-pounders may have been also 18 caliber barrels instead of the 20 calibers with the M1770 piece. We don’t
know.
Also the
way the straps around the wheel fellows are arranged is rather distinctive
Swedish as much as it became distinctive Hessian likewise as the DigAM
collection of scale drawings reveals.
 |
| Swedish gun carriage of 1698. (Source: Online archive of Stockholm Army Museum, Sweden) |
Also of
interest is the Swedish machinery driving the elevating screw, a design that
comes in a wooden case, which is placed on the pointing transom. It looks much
like grandmas’ old coffee mill. We know colonel Dide zu Fürstenstein introduced an elevating screw for the
regimental cannons in 1742. The DigAM collection is missing any hint to its
design, but as the centre transom of the Hessian piece is placed between the
bracket cheeks the very same way as the with Swedish M1725 piece, we should
assume the Hessian design wasn’t much different to the Swedish one. The
distance between barrel and transom is too large for a horizontally placed
screw driven wedge, employed by Prussians and Austrians for example. It must
have been of a vertical design.
 |
| Source: Online archive of Stockholm Army Museum, Sweden |
Here is an
image of the real Swedish M1725 piece. Note the iron gears that serve to
manhandle the piece in action. The Austrians introduced a much similar design
in 1753 with their 3 and 6-pounder filed guns, along with the 7-pounder light
howitzer. There is no indication that Hessian bataillon guns also had them. I
believe the Hessian pieces were moved with ropes only. The above Swedish gears
were designed to manhandle the piece the way illustrated below.
 |
| Source: Jakobsson, Th., Artilleriet under Karl XII:s-tiden, Armémusei Skrifter I, Stockholm 1943 |
Finally,
some more words on the distinctive Hesse–Cassel colour furnish for its
carriages. No word could be found with the sources available to me. I’m left
with this single, albeit, reliable source: an oil painting attributed to Johann
Heinrich Tischbein senior, in 1753 appointed court painter to Landgrave Wilhelm
VIII. (1753-1760). It is titled the ‘Princes painting’ showing Wilhelms’
grandsons.
To the left
we see Wilhelm (later IX), dressed in the officers’ uniform of his regiment
Prinz Wilhelm Cuirassiers (K1). The Kassel museum does not date it, but the
inducement for this painting was most certainly Wilhelms’ declaration as
aspirant of the throne of Hesse Hanau, in 1754. Normally, the son of the
reigning landgrave would receive the countship of Hanau, but Wilhelm VIII. son
Friedrich had converted from Calvinist to Catholic religion sometime before.
The Hanau Estates therefore refused to accept him as their sovereign. For that
reason, his son Wilhelm was to become count of Hanau instead. The settling of
affairs took a number of years. Wilhelm became count of Hanau only in 1760, it
seems. The painting, nevertheless, should be dated earlier or around 1754.
Of
particular interest is the collection of arms on the right fore and background.
The pair of cavalry standards along with the kettle drums of K1 can be
identified and have been regarded as authentic elsewhere before. The pair of
infantry flags can be identified as those of the Hesse-Hanau Landregiment (IR
13 in 1763). Note the colouring of the mortar, and also note the pair of
bataillon guns seen in the right background. I would identify them as the guns
of the Hessian Garde Regiment (IR1), for Wilhelms’ two younger brothers are
dressed in the officers’ uniform of this regiment. The painting was certainly
done at Cassel and the arms would come from the Cassel arsenal rather than that
of Hanau, with exception of the flags, whish should have been the new ones,
bearing the arms of Wilhelm.
A close up
view of the background cannons reveals both are likewise white with the wooden
elements and the metal parts are furnished red. Also the spokes can be seen
painted red. I decided to base my illustration of the details found with this
oil painting. Red and white are the principal Hesse-Cassel colours. Painting
the guns according to the arms colours wasn’t uncommon at all. Examples would
include the early 18th century Prussian white wood / black metal,
Austrian yellow wood / black metal, and Saxony vice versa – to name only a few.
